Equivalence Relations

From Boolean

Some known Equivalence Relations

Two vectorial Boolean functions F,F′:𝔽2n→𝔽2m are called

  • affine (linear) equivalent if there exist A1,A2 affine (linear) permutations of 𝔽2m and 𝔽2n respectively, such that F′=A1∘F∘A2;
  • extended affine equivalent (shortly EA-equivalent) if there exists A:𝔽2n→𝔽2m affine such that F′=F″+A, with F″ affine equivalent to F;
  • Carlet-Charpin-Zinoviev equivalent (shortly CCZ-equivalent) if there exists an affine permutation β„’ of 𝔽2n×𝔽2m such that the image of the graph of F is the graph of F′, i.e. β„’(GF)=GF′ with GF={(x,F(x)):xβˆˆπ”½2n} and GF′={(x,F′(x)):xβˆˆπ”½2n} (magma code).

Clearly, it is possible to estend such definitions also for maps F,F′:𝔽pn→𝔽pm, for 𝑝 a general prime number.

Connections between different relations

Such equivalence relations are connected to each other. Obviously affine equivalence is a general case of linear equivalence and they are both a particular case of the EA-equivalence. Moreover, EA-equivalence is a particular case of CCZ-equivalence and each permutation is CCZ-equivalent to its inverse.

In particular we have that CCZ-equivalence coincides with

  • EA-equivalence for planar functions,
  • linear equivalence for DO planar functions,
  • EA-equivalence for all Boolean functions,
  • EA-equivalence for all bent vectorial Boolean functions,
  • EA-equivalence for two quadratic APN functions.

Invariants

  • The algebraic degree (if the function is not affine) is invariant under EA-equivalence but in general is not preserved under CCZ-equivalence.
  • The differential uniformity is invariant under CCZ-equivalence. (CCZ-equivalence relation is the most general known equivalence relation preserving APN and PN properties)

Invariants in even characteristic

We consider now functions over 𝔽2𝑛.

  • The nonlinearity and the extended Walsh spectrum are invariant under CCZ-equivalence.
  • The Walsh spectrum is invariant under affine equivalence but in general not under EA- and CCZ-equivalence.
  • For APN maps we have also that Ξ”-rank and Ξ“-rank are invariant under CCZ-equivalence.
To define such ranks let consider 𝐹 a (𝑛,𝑛)-function and associate a group algebra element 𝐺𝐹 in 𝔽[𝔽2𝑛×𝔽2𝑛], GF=βˆ‘vβˆˆπ”½2n(v,F(v)).
We have that for 𝐹 APN there exists some subset π·πΉβˆˆπ”½2𝑛×𝔽2π‘›βˆ–{(0,0)} such that GFβ‹…GF=2nβ‹…(0,0)+2β‹…DF.
The Ξ“-rank is the dimension of the ideal generated by 𝐺𝐹 in 𝔽2[𝔽2𝑛×𝔽2𝑛] and the Ξ”-rank is the dimension of the ideal generated by 𝐷𝐹 in 𝔽2[𝔽2𝑛×𝔽2𝑛].
Equivalently we have that
* the Ξ“-rank is the rank of the incidence matrix of dev(𝐺𝐹) over 𝔽2,
* the Ξ”-rank is the 𝔽2-rank of an incidence matrix of dev(𝐷𝐹).
For the incidence structure dev(𝐺𝐹) with blocks GFβ‹…(a,b)={(x+a,F(x)+b):xβˆˆπ”½2n}, for π‘Ž,π‘βˆˆπ”½2𝑛, the related incidence matrix is constructed, indixed by points and blocks, as follow:
the (𝑝,𝐡)-entry is 1 if point 𝑝 is incident with block 𝐡, is 0 otherwise.
The same can be done for 𝐷𝐹.
The multiplier group β„³(𝐺𝐹) of dev(𝐺𝐹) is the set of automorphism Ο† of 𝔽22𝑛 such that Ο†(𝐺𝐹)=𝐺𝐹⋅(𝑒,𝑣) for some 𝑒,π‘£βˆˆπ”½2𝑛. Such automorphisms form a group contained in the automorphism group of dev(𝐺𝐹).