Lower bounds on APN-distance for all known APN functions
The following tables list a lower bound on the Hamming distance between all known CCZ-inequivalent APN representatives up to dimension 11 using the methods described used in [1]. Note that the lower bound is a CCZ-invariant (unlike the exact minimum distance itself) and it can be calculated via the formula [math]\displaystyle{ l(F) = \lceil \frac{m_F}{3} \rceil + 1 }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ l(F) }[/math] is the lower bound on the Hamming distance between an [math]\displaystyle{ (n,n) }[/math]-function [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] and the closest APN function, and [math]\displaystyle{ m_F }[/math] is defined as [math]\displaystyle{ m_F = \min_{b, \beta \in \mathbb{F}_{2^n}} | \{ a \in \mathbb{F}_{2^n} : (\exists x \in \mathbb{F}_{2^n})( F(x) + F(a+x) + F(a + \beta) = b ) \} | }[/math]. The values of [math]\displaystyle{ m_F }[/math] for the CCZ-inequivalent representatives are provided in the tables for convenience. The representatives for dimensions 7 and 8 are taken from the list of Known quadratic APN polynomial functions over GF(2^7) and Known quadratic APN polynomial functions over GF(2^8), respectively, while the rest are taken from the table of CCZ-inequivalent APN functions from the known APN classes over GF(2^n) (for n between 6 and 11).
The table below shows the lower bounds computed for some of the known APN functions for dimensions between 4 and 11. The functions in dimensions between 5 and 8 are indexed according to the table of Known switching classes of APN functions over GF(2^n) for n = 5,6,7,8. The ones between 9 and 11 are index according to the table of CCZ-inequivalent APN functions from the known APN classes over GF(2^n) (for n between 6 and 11). A separate table listing these results for the (more than 8000) known APN functions in dimension 8 is available as Lower bounds on APN-distance for all known APN functions in dimension 8.
Dimension | F | [math]\displaystyle{ m_F }[/math] | Lower bound |
---|---|---|---|
4 | x3 | 3 | 2 |
5 | x3 | 15 | 6 |
5 | x5 | 15 | 6 |
5 | x15 | 9 | 4 |
6 | 1.1 | 27 | 10 |
6 | 1.2 | 27 | 10 |
6 | 2.1 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.2 | 27 | 10 |
6 | 2.3 | 27 | 10 |
6 | 2.4 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.5 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.6 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.7 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.8 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.9 | 21 | 8 |
6 | 2.10 | 21 | 8 |
6 | 2.11 | 15 | 6 |
6 | 2.12 | 15 | 6 |
7 | 7.1 | 54 | 19 |
7 | all others | 63 | 22 |
8 | 1.1 - 1.13 | 111 | 38 |
8 | 1.14 | 99 | 34 |
8 | 1.15 - 1.17 | 111 | 38 |
8 | 2.1 | 111 | 38 |
8 | 3.1 | 111 | 38 |
8 | 4.1 | 99 | 34 |
8 | 5.1 | 105 | 36 |
8 | 6.1 | 105 | 36 |
8 | 7.1 | 111 | 38 |
9 | 9.7 | 231 | 78 |
9 | all others | 255 | 86 |
10 | 10.4 | 477 | 160 |
10 | all others | 495 | 166 |
11 | 11.12 | 978 | 327 |
11 | all others | 1023 | 342 |
- ↑ Budaghyan L, Carlet C, Helleseth T, Kaleyski N. Changing Points in APN Functions. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive. 2018;2018:1217.